A CONSENSUS USE CASE

Put market assumptions on a consistent footing.

Energy producers, commodity-intensive manufacturers and trading or procurement teams face price volatility that can affect capital spending, operating costs and financing needs. Professional consensus forecasts can provide an independent planning baseline for covered commodities, currencies and wider economic indicators. They inform scenario discussion rather than predicting short-term market moves or prescribing a hedge.

THE QUESTION
“How do we test our commodity price and currency assumptions before committing capital or budgets?”
Energy & Commodity BusinessesCONSENSUS ECONOMICS
FORECASTS RELEVANT TO YOUR WORK

Commodity forecasts for energy and procurement teams

Match the information to your decision, then choose an appropriate publication or data format.

01 / FORECASTS

Covered benchmarks such as Brent crude oil and copper, plus currencies and inflation.

02 / EVIDENCE

Professional commodity price expectations, survey revisions and available ranges.

03 / PRACTICAL OUTPUT

A price exposure and FX sensitivity register tied to the operating plan.

04 / ACCESS

Energy, metals and agriculture forecast publications and associated data.

The examples below use illustrative figures. Available data and usage rights depend on the service.

01 / THE SITUATION

Here’s the decision.

The operating plan

An international manufacturer is reviewing the sensitivity of next year’s costs to commodity prices.

The procurement budget assumes lower input prices, while treasury expects a less favourable currency path. Senior management wants a common external benchmark, clarity about the spread of professional expectations and an explanation of which assumptions could materially affect margins. The team must still model contract prices, basis risk and operational exposures itself.

THE OBJECTIVE

Build a documented external reference and test the company-specific price and currency sensitivities before approving the plan.

02 / THE WORKFLOW

Comparing commodity price expectations
with operating assumptions.

Separate commodity benchmark forecasts from company-specific realised costs, compare the house budget to outside expectations, then test exposures and document decisions.

STEP 01

Map the real exposure

Identify relevant commodities, currency pairs, countries and forecast horizons; distinguish market benchmarks from contracted input costs.

STEP 02

Establish a comparable baseline

Compare the internal price and foreign exchange assumptions with covered professional forecasts using consistent units and dates.

STEP 03

Challenge the assumptions

Review forecast revisions and dispersion, then model the effect of internally defined price and currency sensitivities.

STEP 04

Translate into decisions

Show margins, cash flow, project sensitivities and mitigation options alongside source and assumption limitations.

03 / A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

A worked example.
The numbers in context.

Which input-price assumptions could change the budget?

A manufacturer compares its internal commodity and foreign exchange inputs with illustrative outside benchmarks. Every number here is synthetic.

WORKING EXAMPLEIllustrative example

Swipe sideways to view the complete example table

Planning driverInternal budgetProfessional benchmark
Brent crude (synthetic USD/bbl)$104$112
Copper (synthetic index points)8478
USD/local currency1.181.14
THE PRACTICAL DELIVERABLE

A sensitivity register linking each economic input, dated benchmark and company exposure to a named planning owner.

SUITABLE STARTING POINTExplore forecast publications

Review commodity and FX forecast availability and confirm definitions before modelling.

GO FURTHER / APPLY THE FULL DISTRIBUTION

The range behind
the average.

Use commodity price and currency forecasts as outside references for budget sensitivities. Survey highs and lows show professional disagreement; they are not a recommended hedge or an expected trading range.

FORECAST DISTRIBUTIONSynthetic Brent crude oil price in USD/bbl, same forecast horizon
Consensus mean$112
Low$88
High$145
Standard deviation$15
BEHIND THE AVERAGE

Illustrative professional forecasts of $98 and $132 demonstrate divergence around the mean. The figures do not incorporate the company’s contracts or actual purchase costs.

LOW · $88HIGH · $145
Consensus mean Selected individual forecasts
A PRACTICAL SCENARIO OR RESEARCH TEST

Separate a price benchmark from operating exposure

Illustrative example

Swipe sideways to review the scenario table

Budget lensIllustrative referenceDecision question
External reference$112/bblHow does it compare with the synthetic $104/bbl budget input?
Lower-price sensitivity$88/bblWhat would change in cost of goods and cash flow, including FX?
Higher-price sensitivity$145/bblWhich operational protections and capital-spend decisions merit stress testing?

All figures are synthetic. Forecaster lows and highs are not probability intervals or self-contained price paths. Contract terms, freight, product specifications, basis risk, currency exposures and hedges must be modelled separately.

OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR THIS AUDIENCE

Further applications.

01 / APPLICATION

Procurement planning

Prioritise the commodity assumptions that matter most for purchase budgets.

USE THE DATA

Compare survey forecasts with company-specific volumes and contracts.

OUTPUT

A price and exposure sensitivity table.

02 / APPLICATION

Capital investment analysis

Test project returns against alternative input and output price assumptions.

USE THE DATA

Record external vintages and internally designed scenarios.

OUTPUT

A capital-project macro assumptions pack.

03 / APPLICATION

Treasury and FX coordination

Keep the FX and commodity reference dates aligned in financial plans.

USE THE DATA

Document FX assumptions and potential joint sensitivities rather than assuming unrelated market moves.

OUTPUT

A treasury and procurement review memo.

04 / WHAT YOU TAKE AWAY

A practical result.
Ready to review.

Build an output that can be explained, challenged and updated as forecasts change.

How the consensus is calculated
EXAMPLE DELIVERABLE↗
Illustrative commodities deliverable

A price-exposure sensitivity register

A practical planning table linking economic and commodity forecast assumptions to operating exposure, owner and sensitivity.

WHAT IT CONTAINS
Commodity and FX benchmarks with survey dates
Internal assumption differences and sensitivity ranges
Operational exposure, mitigation owner and review trigger
Adapt the example to your own data and decision process.
05 / THE CONSENSUS ADVANTAGE

Why the data
matter here.

Match the forecast inputs to the decision. The average, the distribution and the historical record serve different purposes.

RELEVANT FORECAST INPUTS
01

Selected commodity price expectations by market where covered

02

Foreign exchange and inflation forecasts

03

Professional forecast revisions and ranges where available

WHY CONSENSUS ECONOMICS

Comparable outside reference for volatile inputs.

Professional commodity, inflation and FX expectations provide reference points for budget and capital spending discussions. Survey revisions and disagreement help prioritise the sensitivities worth testing. Forecasts are not spot quotes, hedge instructions, or probability-weighted price distributions.

1,000+professional forecasters1989first survey
COMMON QUESTIONS

Practical questions, clear answers.

Are the Brent and copper figures in the worked example actual forecasts?

No. All numerical values in the worked example and scenario lab are synthetic illustrations. Use the linked commodity coverage pages for information about actual services.

How can commodity forecasts support procurement?

Compare professional price expectations with your contracted grades, delivery terms, currency exposures and purchasing assumptions.

06 / MAKE IT YOUR OWN

The next step,
for your workflow.

Check commodity coverage, units, forecast horizon and the relevant currency series for procurement, cash-flow and strategy models.

Explore the available data, historical coverage and licensing options with our team.