A CONSENSUS USE CASE

A better budget starts with assumptions you can explain.

When every business unit brings a different economic outlook, financial planning becomes a debate about inputs rather than decisions. An external benchmark drawn from professional private sector forecasters offers a common reference point.

THE QUESTION
“How do we build next year’s budget when every market is moving differently?”
FP&A & TreasuryCONSENSUS ECONOMICS
01 / THE SITUATION

Here’s the decision.

The budget cycle

A finance team is preparing its annual plan across several countries.

Regional leaders have their own GDP and inflation assumptions. Treasury is worried about currency movements, and the CFO wants to understand what changed since the previous forecast round. The team needs a repeatable way to challenge its plan without outsourcing its judgement.

THE OBJECTIVE

Agree a documented base case, then stress-test the important deviations before the board review.

02 / THE WORKFLOW

From raw question
to useful evidence.

Benchmark the budget, run cost and currency sensitivities, and keep a record of assumptions that changed at each reforecast.

STEP 01

Choose comparable markets

Select the economies and indicators that actually drive revenue, payroll, financing and input costs.

STEP 02

Benchmark the base case

Compare internal assumptions with the current consensus mean and, where available, the range of individual forecasts.

STEP 03

Build the scenarios

Create upside and downside sensitivities around material growth, inflation, FX and interest-rate drivers.

STEP 04

Track what changed

Review revisions at each survey and record which assumptions the team accepted, challenged or overrode.

03 / A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

A worked example.
The numbers in context.

Which budget assumptions need a closer look?

A finance team checks two regional inflation assumptions against an external reference before finalising the group budget.

WORKING EXAMPLEIllustrative example

Swipe sideways to view the complete example table

Planning inputInternal budgetOutside benchmark
Market A inflation4.03%3.47%
Market B inflation2.46%2.73%
Selected currency assumption1.131.08
THE PRACTICAL DELIVERABLE

Budget register with each assumption, external benchmark, variance, decision owner and review date.

SUITABLE STARTING POINTExplore structured Excel forecasts

Comparable survey data for repeatable budgeting files and periodic assumption reviews.

GO FURTHER / APPLY THE FULL DISTRIBUTION

The range behind
the average.

Build a rolling planning range rather than treating one inflation or exchange-rate assumption as certain. Translate economic sensitivity into a commercial budget question.

FORECAST DISTRIBUTIONMarket A consumer-price inflation, matching budget year
Consensus mean3.47%
Low2.68%
High4.31%
Standard deviation0.39 pp
BEHIND THE AVERAGE

Selected individual views: 3.21% and 3.83%. The spread helps the finance team decide which assumption deserves an escalation or an earlier review.

LOW · 2.68%HIGH · 4.31%
Consensus mean Selected individual forecasts
A PRACTICAL SCENARIO OR RESEARCH TEST

Build a three-way budgeting sensitivity

Illustrative example

Swipe sideways to review the scenario table

Budget caseInflation inputCommercial modelling action
Baseline budget3.47%Apply to the inflation-linked portion of operating costs.
Cost-pressure sensitivity4.31%Recalculate margin and working-capital requirements.
Disinflation sensitivity2.68%Test pricing flexibility and potential margin recovery.

High and low are individual submissions, not calibrated probabilities. Apply assumptions only to the exposed cost base and use matching FX quote conventions and planning horizons.

OTHER APPLICATIONS FOR THIS AUDIENCE

Further applications.

01 / APPLICATION

Treasury FX exposure review

Test whether the budget exchange rate is far from professional views.

USE THE DATA

Compare internal FX assumptions with the survey mean and forecast range, then test cash-flow conversion.

OUTPUT

A monthly treasury exposure and hedge-review sheet.

02 / APPLICATION

Rolling reforecast triggers

Decide when changing macro expectations should reopen the annual plan.

USE THE DATA

Monitor survey-to-survey revisions and SD; set internal thresholds for assumption review.

OUTPUT

A budget assumption register with change triggers and decision owners.

04 / WHAT YOU TAKE AWAY

A practical result.
Ready to review.

Build an output that can be explained, challenged and updated as forecasts change.

How the consensus is calculated
EXAMPLE DELIVERABLE↗
Illustrative finance deliverable

A board-ready assumptions register

A single page showing the internal assumption, external benchmark, key range of expectations, owner and reason for any override.

WHAT IT CONTAINS
Market-level growth and inflation baseline
FX and rate sensitivities
Revision notes for the next reforecast
Adapt the example to your own data and decision process.
05 / THE CONSENSUS ADVANTAGE

Why the data
matter here.

Match the forecast inputs to the decision. The average, the distribution and the historical record serve different purposes.

RELEVANT FORECAST INPUTS
01

Country GDP and consumer-price forecasts

02

Interest-rate and foreign-exchange expectations

03

Monthly survey revisions and individual views

WHY CONSENSUS ECONOMICS

Make the budget baseline defensible.

Comparable country forecasts give business units a common starting point. High and low estimates help frame sensitivities, while survey revisions provide an orderly trigger to revisit the plan rather than reacting to every headline.

1,000+professional forecasters1989first survey
06 / MAKE IT YOUR OWN

The next step,
for your workflow.

Review structured macro, currency and historical series for your budgeting and reforecast process.

Data fields, countries, history and access rights vary by product and agreement; confirm coverage before designing a workflow.

KEEP EXPLORING

Different decision. Same independent starting point.

Corporates & StrategySee how corporate strategy teams use consensus← See all 8 use cases